.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

The Foxhole Philosopher

A forum for thoughtful discussion of practical issues facing the military, civil, and political world today. None of the Opinions expressed here are a reflection of United States, her Military, or any other organization other than those of the author.

Name:
Location: Iraq

6.29.2006

Selflessness is the key to Greatness

I could be wrong but Warren Buffett's tremendous generousity is an example of what has made America great. The fact is that he is not the first, but a tradition of generosity from American citizens that has strengthened America, and the world. Carnegie libraries brough books to millions, and changed our world. Bill Gates is trying to cure HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis. Even those who held onto their wealth, donated to universities, or museums (e.g. the Huntington Libraries and Gardens)

Perhaps more important is that this is part of the general spirit of Americans: giving. People willingly, without being taxed give millions of dollars and even more precious time. I think this is what has allowed us to become the nation we are. If we ever lose that, then we are in serious trouble.

6.27.2006

How More Media in Iraq Would Help

This is partially a response to a quotation of my blog at http://thoughtsopinionsrants.blogspot.com/. I have left a comment there as well, which I will not rehash here. I highly encourage crossreferencing, so that the Weblog community can be a true dialogue, even and especially if you disagree with me.

I wish that we had more media and not less here in Iraq. While in the past I have said that the Mass Media is not our ally, and I stand by that, at least somewhat, I have come to believe it is the absence and not the presence thereof that is the problem.

Right now, journalists rely on stringers, or at best show up for a few days in a year and they don't really have a firm grasp on the situation. The solution would be to have embedded journalists over the long haul. We could easily protect them, and they would really know what is going on.

A perfect example of this is a recent journalist visit that I was in charge of security for. This was good journalist who asked a lot of questions, but clearly did not understand the cultural differences. She was asking aggressive questions of a General in the Iraqi police, asking why he was unable to provide security. Most Americans would respond with a plan, or an apology, or a statement of "this is merely an outlier..." However to him, and I am pretty sure to every Iraqi, this was a question he didn't understand at all. His only responsibility was to justify himself, and he just made a lot of excuses, and didn't even care when she tried to nail him down. If she had been here for a month or two, she would have adapted to that already.

There are three things that direct media coverage will solve, and I will address each of these in a later blog:

1) Iraqis have a different sense of honesty than we do. Therefore it is perfectly alright for them to tell journalists what they think they want to hear. Quality of reporting and honesty will go up. (We experience this problem in the military as well, when Iraqi's tell us what they think we want to hear.)

2) Arab culture does have similar roots to western culture, but religion, politics and history have taken it down a different path. Many people rely exclusively on the media's portrayal of the conflict, which is flawed. Arabs have mastered pretending to be Western for a few minutes during interviews. Therefore more direct media coverage would allow a more accurate portrayal of the cultural issues, and values with which we are dealing.

3) Finally, it used to be that everyone had been in , or was related to someone that had been in the military. This is no longer true. Therefore, many people have mistaken concepts about soldiers and the military. The Blogosphere tries to help with this, but its very diverse nature and the ability of people to pick and choose to whom they listen leaves us without an authoritative voice. Therefore, more direct media coverage would paint a better picture of the military.

I think each of these topics could probably take up whole books, but stay tuned...

6.26.2006

A Caveat from the Future (or maybe the past)

Once upon a time, Iraq was a prosperous nation, that spanned huge swaths of land, produced all it needed, and was the envy of all around it. Actually, three times upon a time. The first was the long period during which alternatively the Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Babylonians (again), and Medes (which many Kurds believe that they are descendents of) ruled what is now Iraq, and they were arguably the most prosperous and advanced nation during this time. From that time, until the rise, and arrival of the Arabs, Iraq was ruled by a succession of foreign invaders, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Parthians, Sassanians, and so on. But once the Arabs did arrive, they found in Iraq a vast repository of knowledge from the previous civilizations, and they raised Iraq and specifically Baghdad to its height of power. There was another brief interlude following first Turkic, and then Mongol invasions, where Iraq slid into ill repair, but during the 1600’s during the Ottoman Age, Baghdad was a jewel of the crown, and wealthy beyond compare.

However, now, Iraq is a basket case, and it has nothing to do with George W. Bush’s policies, or military mistakes. Iraq has slowly been ruining itself over the last two hundred years! I don’t know when it started but I know what the problem is: selfishness.

Of course, Americans are proverbial for materialism, and that reputation is well deserved, but I have never seen a more self centered culture in my entire life. Earlier this week there was an IED that killed several people at a certain location. Were the people who lived nearby concerned about the death toll? Did they care about those who had been killed, who were actually their relatives? Did they look for a way to stop the carnage? Did they look for ways to help their neighbor? Did they even ask what we were going to do to fix the problem? NO! All they were concerned about was how military activities attempting to make the area more secure were going to affect them. One woman even said that she didn’t care what happened as long as we didn’t disturb her.

This attitude is what ensures that Iraq will remain a third world country. When disaster strikes there are two options: help out, or rip off. If society chooses rip off, even once, it risks destroying itself. On a grander scale, everyday, people have to choose whether to look out for themselves, or the greater good. The simplest example is a line, at a bank, or for gas, or whatever. If you look out only for yourself you are going to try and cut, but if you look out for the greater good, you will stay and wait your turn. The irony is that if you try and cut, you might get gas sooner, but it is more sure if everyone waits their turn.

Of course, this is an example of the tragedy of the commons problem. Every society deals with it, but the more blood and treasure that is spent trying to ensure that people are following the basic rules the less money is available for other things like national security. Here, an entire Army company must secure the gas station to prevent riots! This of course leads to all kinds of corruption, and kick backs, but most importantly it diverts important resources away from other more critical problems. (Can you imagine if there had to be thirty US soldiers at every gas station, how colossal a goat rope that would be.) The biggest issue is that no one sees themselves as part of the problem. As I said before, everyone thinks they are the exception to the rule.

This should really be taken as a warning. We don’t seem to have lost our sense of civic responsibility in the United States, yet. But it only takes a generation, and once it is gone, it will take a generation and probably more to get back, if that is possible. Perhaps we should start teaching Civics in High Schools again. Maybe these are some moral values we can all agree on.